← Reference Guides
Understanding Cut Pages

How to Read a Cut Page

A field guide to The Cut Guide's reference pages · What every number means · How to turn data into a purchase decision

Each cut page on The Cut Guide presents a comprehensive reference for a single diamond or gemstone shape — its geometry, optical properties, specifications, and history. Reading one takes about three minutes. Using one well takes understanding what each section is actually telling you and how the pieces fit together into an informed buying decision.

None of our cut pages are written to sell anything. They exist to give you the same information a knowledgeable gemologist would share before you walked into a showroom — and to give it to you in a form you can return to as many times as you need.

The anatomy of a cut page
CUT NAME · ORIGIN · FACET COUNT One-line description of optical character Who cuts it · Category · When developed ① HEADER Name & context BRILLIANCE · FIRE · SCINTILLATION Scored 0–100 relative to other cuts Use to compare shapes — not absolute brightness ② SCORES Optical character vs. other cuts DEPTH % · TABLE % · RATIO · GIRDLE Spec ranges from GIA reports for this shape Green = good · Yellow = acceptable · Red = avoid ③ SPECS Grading report numbers to check FACETS Count + layout → guide link CUT GRADE GIA graded or not → guide link CLARITY FLOOR Eye-clean minimum → guide link ④ CALLOUTS Key facts, each linked to a guide ORIGINATOR / HISTORY Who developed it · When · Why BUYING NOTE Shape pitfalls · What to ask for ⑤ CONTEXT History & buyer guidance
Every cut page follows a consistent structure: header data, optical performance scores, specification ranges, callout boxes linking to deep-dive reference guides, and context about the cut's history and common purchase pitfalls.
Section by section: what to look for
SectionWhat it showsHow to use it
HeaderCut name, origin, facet count, primary use caseOrientation — confirm you're reading the right shape and understand its category
Brilliance scoreWhite light return relative to other cuts; 0–100 scaleIf light return is your priority, prefer scores above 80. Round tops the scale at ~98.
Fire scoreColored dispersion (spectral flash) relative to other cutsIf fire and color play are important, look for scores above 60. Asscher and radiant are high-fire step/hybrid cuts.
Scintillation scoreMovement-driven sparkle; combines flash points and pattern contrastBrilliant cuts score highest. If you'll wear in motion or low light, prioritize this score.
Size per caratApparent face-up area relative to round for the same carat weightElongated shapes (marquise, pear, oval) appear larger per carat than round. If visual size matters, consult this score alongside actual mm dimensions.
Depth % rangeIdeal and acceptable depth percentage for this shapeCheck the grading report. If the stone is outside the ideal range, ask why — it may be optimized for weight, not appearance.
Table % rangeIdeal table proportion for this shapeWorks in concert with crown angle for rounds. For fancy shapes, use as a sanity check — outside the range suggests disproportionate cutting.
Cut grade calloutWhether GIA grades this cut's quality; what to use insteadFor rounds, confirm GIA Excellent or AGS 0. For fancy shapes, this callout will explain the evaluation alternatives.
Facets calloutTotal facet count and structure notesContext for the scintillation character — more facets generally means more flash points; fewer facets means larger reflections.
Clarity minimum calloutEye-clean clarity floor for this shapeStep cuts require VVS territory; brilliant cuts can go to SI1 in many cases. Use this before setting a clarity budget.
Originator sectionWho developed the cut and whenContext — understand where the design came from and why it exists in its current form.
Buying noteShape-specific risks and what to watch forThe most practical section for active buyers. Read this before you visit a retailer or contact an online vendor.
Reading optical scores in context

The brilliance, fire, and scintillation scores on each cut page are comparative, not absolute. They rank cuts against each other based on their optical character under typical conditions. They do not predict how bright a specific stone will appear in a specific room under specific lighting — no reference guide can do that without examining the individual stone.

Use the scores to understand trade-offs. A cushion cut scores lower on brilliance than a round brilliant, but higher on fire than most other shapes. That tells you something useful: a cushion is a good choice if you value color play and can accept slightly less overall brightness. An emerald cut scores lower on both scintillation and brilliance but produces reflections that are distinctive and that some buyers prefer strongly. The scores don't tell you which cut is "best" — there is no best, only best for a specific buyer with specific preferences.

Two numbers that matter more than scores are the actual millimeter dimensions of the stone you are considering, and the depth percentage reported on the grading certificate. The dimensions tell you the true face-up size. The depth percentage tells you how much of the carat weight is actually sitting above the setting where you can see it. These are verifiable facts about a specific stone; optical scores are characteristics of a cut style.

Key takeaway

A cut page is a starting point, not a buying guide. Use it to understand what a specific shape is and how it behaves optically before you start shopping. Use the specification ranges to evaluate stones on a grading report. Use the buying note to understand what to watch for in that specific shape. Then evaluate the actual stone — or have it evaluated — using the tools and knowledge you came here to build.

Once you know what you're reading, drop your cert into the Cert Checker — it reads the proportion data and flags how the cut stacks up.

Open the Cert Checker →